Post by stdaga on Oct 25, 2020 15:50:53 GMT
I wonder if this is foreshadowing of Bran's possibilities with Hodor. Even if so, it isn't the same, but could be close
I just had a thought that perhaps if someone is inhabiting Beric, that it's a different person each time, and that person knows him or his background less and less, hence the reason that he seems to forget more about himself all of the time? Still, I am inclined to think it's him, and that his mind is becoming more fractured with each death and rebirth. Or not quite death, but something like death.
As to Bran and Hodor, if Hodor start's speaking, then people who knew him before all of this happened should suspect something is wrong. If that is the case, I would think that Old Nan will play a part in the situation. She know's Hodor, and knows him well, since she is his family. I do think we might see a bit more of Hodor wielding a weapon with Bran in charge, but whether that will include speech, I don't know. Heck, Meera and Jojen should know that something isn't right either.
I guess I always thought that Arya's question to Thoros was in regards to Ned's death, with them both thinking it is not possible to raise a headless man, such as Ned Stark now is. But of course, I see hints of resurrection around Ned, so I wonder if it could be possible, with someone who is much more powerful than Thoros wielding the magic. There is focus on Ned's remains. I think that Tyrion focuses on the silver thread that holds Ned's skull to his shoulders, and then Cat's thoughts while looking at Ned's skeletal remains, quite remind me of the Osiris story.
As to Thoros and Beric, it does seem like Thoros doesn't think he could raise a headless man, but he never tried. When he started, I don't think he realized that he could actually raise a man who had died in any way. Beric still has scar's on his body where injuries occurred, but the scars don't seem to impede him that much in life, even the one where the Hound cut's deeply into his shoulder. Could you place a head on a severed neck and see if it will reattach with the magic words?
I might be remembering some of these details wrong. I will have to dive into the text for a refresher. Weirdly enough, I had a book mark in place right at the start of the Hound's fight with Beric. Beric lights his own sword on fire with his blood, but does he do that with every fight, to give him power or strength, or is it only with the Hound, as if they know he fears fire and that is done to be another weapon to weaken the Hound? Anyway, it's not a human ability to do this thing. Thoros fought with a flaming sword in battle, but he used wildfire for that trick. Beric uses his own blood. There is also imagery of one of the dogs on Clegane's shield loosing a head, and then all three dogs being engulfed in flame. I am not sure if that's foreshadowing or not, but the Hound comes out the victor. Because his own sword breaks the flaming sword of Beric's on a final desperate thrust, and then imbeds down past Beric's breast bone. Still, it's vague how deep or deadly that injury was, but blood comes out of Beric's mouth and he topples to the ground. That seems pretty bad! Thoros, Edric Dayne (who is called Ned repeatedly in that scene) Jack be Lucky and Lem Lemoncloak seem to be the ones who take Beric away and are witness to what ever Thoros does to revive him. Lem, Jack and Edric Dayne are all still alive, as is Thoros, so perhaps one of them will reveal more details to us at some point. Jack and Lem and Thoros are still with Stoneheart, but Edric Dayne is not.
It suddenly makes me wonder about Jon's dream of himself with a sword burning red in his hand so perhaps Jon does become something similar to Beric and similar to infuse fire into his weapon? Maybe Mel does raise him with her powers, and the sword of Jon's burning in his had is Longclaw lit by his own blood?
In that fight with Beric and the Hound, there is a reference to a flaming sword meeting a "cold one", which might be a play on Jon Snow's flaming sword who seems to be fighting cold enemies who are climbing the wall. There are also hint's of a "cage of fire" which I have never really noted in the text, either, but reminds me of Mance/Rattleshirt burning in a cage. Perhaps there are more parallel's to be picked out of that scene with the Hound and Beric fighting?
I agree it's quite hard to know what is going on in Stoneheart's mind. Is it Cat? Could it be someone or something else entirely? Something about Stoneheart's fascination with Robb's crown makes me think that Robb is involved. How she turns in and stares at it reminds me of how Robb held and looked at his crown, took it off, set it aside, and then put it back on when he made the decision to execute Rickard Karstark. But that might not be anything more than me being fanciful. And as far as we know, Stoneheart never places Robb's crown on her head, just looks at it and holds it.
I agree. We don't know Beric really at all. We see him from a far a couple times, and the only time he speaks in in the throne room when Ned picks him to go hunt down the Mountain. It's not much at all, I think the only words are "As you command, Lord Eddard", but that surely seemed to have stuck with Beric. But we really know nothing of his personality or actions before or after this scene. Just his lightening bolt sigil, that he is a "storm lord" from the Stormlands, that he has red-gold hair, and seems to be engaged to a Dayne from Dorne.
Sleeping Beauty does hint at a great awakening, not the Disney version of the tale, but something darker and deeper. I don't so much get the sexual vibe from Stoneheart, yet Cat did want another child (Ned talks of this as well), and so that sexual undercurrent is there in a way. The kiss is also a hint of that. We also have the Jon Snow/Ygritte "Lord's kiss" that might be compared to this in some way, although I don't have the energy to drop into that rabbit hole at this moment. Okay, maybe I do. I will dip a toe into the rabbit hole... Oral sex is not how babies are made, but what about magic babies that could be part of a kiss of fire? Could they be planted by a special "kiss"? I will stop now...
It is interesting. The title Prince or Princess in Dorne is most definitly tied to the Rhoynar influence. Before the Conquest, though, there were King's in all the other Kingdom's, and in Dorne, too. But in Dorne, they referred to their great ruler as a Prince instead of a king. That has been part of Dornish culture since the time of Nymeria and her children, however long ago that was. I think it's very important that they held onto that, and it's why I am really beginning to see that "the prince that was promised" might tie more to Martell/Dorne/Rhoynar history that to Targaryen history. It's just that recently, the Targaryen's have become tied to Dorne with multiple generations of marriage.
I think Mance does call himself a King, the King Beyond the Wall. I think Osha makes a comment to Bran about it, yet she seems to scoff at Mance several times, as if she is not a fan of his. Craster also scoffs as this title for Mance. I think Mance used the title as a bid for power, to control more tribes, to get them to follow him. And he is reusing a title that has been used by other men in the past who have unified the tribes of wildlings. Mance even describes himself and the men in the tent in this way to Jon Snow when they first meet. To Mance, I think the title is about power and respect and leadership, something he needs to hold it all together. But I am not sure that Mance himself see's his son as a prince, but perhaps he does. The jump to Val being a princess because her sister was married to a "king" is the large and crazy leap, one that Stannis seems to employ to tie her to a great lord and Winterfell by marriage. That is quite a stretch, if you ask me.
I don't think Rhaegar is ever called that within the story, perhaps only by myself, and shymaid when she still used to come to the board. It was my defense reaction to most everyone thinking Rhaegar was perfect, since I don't really see him that way. I suppose it is a bit of an insult.
Some said it had been Gregor who'd dashed the skull of the infant prince Aegon Targaryen against a wall, and whispered that afterward he had raped the mother, the Dornish princess Elia, before putting her to the sword. These things were not said in Gregor's hearing.
"Ser Willem Darry is fled to Dragonstone, with your queen and Prince Viserys. I thought you might have sailed with him."
Haha! Some rabbit holes are dark and dangerous, much like some "nights" and "knights". I do think the title of Prince does seem to tie to Viserys and Rhaegar, as Aerys sons, and also to Rhaegar's children, just as Princess is tied to Daenerys or even the young princess Rhaenys. Rhaenys is the interesting one to me, because she would be a "princess" through both her mother and her father. Actually, any child of Rhaegar and Elia could claim the title prince/princess through their Dornish Rhoynar blood as well as their Targaryen king's blood. But I am not sure how much any title is really worth in this story. It could be very important, or GRRM might just try to show us that titles don't really mean anything.