Yeah I did whisper an actual sentence. I don’t know what they’re going to do going forward and I don’t know what importance it has so I’m definitely not going to risk saying anything.
All art is at once surface and symbol. Those who go beneath the surface do so at their peril. Those who read the symbol do so at their peril. It is the spectator, and not life, that art really mirrors. Oscar Wilde.
Well, if they bring in a huge backstory where Rhaegar and Lyanna were in contact between Harrenhal and her disappearance, I could maybe see it. But that seems very unlikely given how we've been told the raven messaging works in Westeros--via the Maesters.
I was talking about the book-version of RLJ having more holes than story... but yes, the show will likely not fuss over such issues. Which, again, makes it seem really odd that they featured Arthur Dayne is such a prominent way in the third episode this season.
Why was that part of the story important to include, if RLJ? It could have been a few nameless/Dawn-less kingsguard. No dialogue required other than the "Our prince wanted us here..."
If they are going with RLJ, I don't understand why they would have set it up this way. But then, they are not exactly masters of storytelling.
Or if he ended up with her (per my Tywin theory)--saved her from her attackers and she fell for him that way. . . those scenarios could work.
They could indeed. I still think Lyanna was not abucted, and therefore required no rescue from anyone other than herself... but I do agree those saving-scenarios could work.
HBO is doing their best, but their best is pretty damn bad in terms of depth and continuity. :/
In the meantime, I highly reccomend his other writings, particulary the 1000 Worlds short-stories stuff. It feels like ASOIAF. You'll meet Lyanna several times (as well as several interesting archetypes for her lover), an older Jon, Varys, Melisandre, Khal Drogo and his bloodriders, the Others, wights, and even visit places that mirror Winterfell, King's Landing, the House of the Undying, and you'll find yourself skinchanging and greenseeing more times than you can count.
And, by SSM, Dawn's waits at Starfall for until the next Sword of the Morning shall rise. Meaning--someone's a-comin'.
Someone indeed. A swordsman worthy of the blade. Ned, was not... nor was Howland Reed. It seems a missing presence in Westeros that dates to the Dawn of Days. A presence missing for seventeen years... hmm...
Fans of the series speculate about his parentage, with a large number believing that his true parentage is likely to be Lyanna Stark and Rhaegar Targaryen.[50]
In the Season 6 finale episode of Game of Thrones, titled "The WInds of Winter", this theory is confirmed to be true in the television series at least,as Bran sees the dying Lyanna giving baby Jon to her brother Eddard and making him swear to protect her child.
The bolded. . . huh. They give the statement and then the proof.
I find their "proof" a bit lacking. . . suggestive, but lacking.
Confirmed?!
Kindred gun-jumping spirits.
"I can see it. You have more of the north in you than your brothers."
I was talking about the book-version of RLJ having more holes than story... but yes, the show will likely not fuss over such issues. Which, again, makes it seem really odd that they featured Arthur Dayne is such a prominent way in the third episode this season.
And featured his sword in two episodes this season in direct relation to Ned, Lyanna, and Jon.
Why was that part of the story important to include, if RLJ? It could have been a few nameless/Dawn-less kingsguard. No dialogue required other than the "Our prince wanted us here..."
YUP! If the scene was about the nobility of the kingsguard at their post, Bran and Bloodraven's narration and facial expressions make little sense.
A few nameless kingsguard dying nobly would have made the point just fine. The heavy handed narration belies that interp.
If they are going with RLJ, I don't understand why they would have set it up this way. But then, they are not exactly masters of storytelling.
Well, to Wraith point, I don't know why they set Dorne up as they did. Or, to @marg171 point, I don't get why they did Stannis as they did.
But to name Arthur but not the other guy and to put that breakfast cereal sigil on Dawn--why on earth bother unless they are going to do something with it?
They could indeed. I still think Lyanna was not abucted, and therefore required no rescue from anyone other than herself... but I do agree those saving-scenarios could work.
All fair. But I tend to think the wolf blood that got her in trouble was the lust that got her pregnant. At that point, she was in rather a fix--afraid to go home. If she'd been "rescued" like Arya was by Yoren or even by the Brotherhood, her wolf blood wouldn't have hurt her. It's the pregnancy that likely made Lyanna dead before her time.
Someone indeed. A swordsman worthy of the blade. Ned, was not... nor was Howland Reed. It seems a missing presence in Westeros that dates to the Dawn of Days. A presence missing for seventeen years... hmm...
Well, we're all just interpreting what we read and see. So, all fair. I just can't see the heft in their evidence.
All art is at once surface and symbol. Those who go beneath the surface do so at their peril. Those who read the symbol do so at their peril. It is the spectator, and not life, that art really mirrors. Oscar Wilde.
And featured his sword in two episodes this season in direct relation to Ned, Lyanna, and Jon.
Yup! Ned's guilt trifecta: Arthur, Lyanna, Jon...
And notice the way they cast/directed Arthur Dayne.
Who did he remind you of?
He didn't seem much like Tyrion. Or Bronn. Or Theon. Or Jaime. Or Barristan. Or even Robb.
He seemed like Sean Bean in Season 1. Contemplative. Haunted. Regretful.
AKA, Jon in Season 6.
Why did they have him act that way?
Well, I think it's because the tower of joy fundamentally changed Ned. Ned was under the influence of Jon Arryn and Robert Baratheon up until and throughout the Rebellion.
Jon Arryn and Robert Baratheon would not have built those cairns, and I doubt they would have returned Dawn to Starfall.
Jaime Lannister somehow became the Smiling Knight, and Eddard Stark somehow became Arthur Dayne.
What made Ned go to Starfall instead of Winterfell?
The sword is not enough, particularly if he had Jon and Lyanna's body in custody.
YUP! If the scene was about the nobility of the kingsguard at their post, Bran and Bloodraven's narration and facial expressions make little sense.
A few nameless kingsguard dying nobly would have made the point just fine. The heavy handed narration belies that interp.
Agreed, the dialogue and expressions of Bran and BR would be completly useless if they are going with RLJ. And notice that in the show, BR is not BR. He isn't a Targaryen. He was just an old man, who is now dead. If R+L=J, that seems an awful waste of a character who might explain Jon's purpose as a Targaryen bastard, or king.
Well, to Wraith point, I don't know why they set Dorne up as they did. Or, to @marg171 point, I don't get why they did Stannis as they did.
True. You can't fix stupid. I never really cared much for Stannis, but now I feel really bad for him. He goes missing in combat and Davos spends his time stroking Jon's cock. Shireen is burned at the stake, and suddenly Davos remembers the Baratheon family. Fuck that. And fuck Jon for letting Melisandre live after burning a little girl.
But to name Arthur but not the other guy and to put that breakfast cereal sigil on Dawn--why on earth bother unless they are going to do something with it?
Preach! Very Bran-flakes-y, no?
"Corn?!" ...Summer's sweet children.
When the Night is Long, you need Dawn. Not fire and blood.
All fair. But I tend to think the wolf blood that got her in trouble was the lust that got her pregnant. At that point, she was in rather a fix--afraid to go home. If she'd been "rescued" like Arya was by Yoren or even by the Brotherhood, her wolf blood wouldn't have hurt her. It's the pregnancy that likely made Lyanna dead before her time.
Ned seems to disagree with you regarding the harmful nature of wolf-blood:
'The wolf blood,' my father used to call it. Lyanna had a touch of it, and my brother Brandon more than a touch. It brought them both to an early grave."
A Feast for Crows - The Queenmaker As she led the princess to the fire, Arianne found Ser Gerold behind her. "My House goes back ten thousand years, unto the dawn of days," he complained. "Why is it that my cousin is the only Dayne that anyone remembers?"
The Darkstar seems to be suggesting that other than Arthur, other Daynes are nameless and faceless ...
One wonders if they were unlucky enough to be born with no name of their own?
Do you see what I see? Must tag @superunknown5 .
And mayhaps the origins of the House are shrouded in a forbidden darkness? Seems to me Dawn can only come from such a place.
But I can't un-see the use of that sword. In books or show.
Hello. My name is Sly Wren. And I have Dawn blindness.
It's bad enough having the hugest crush on a five minute appearance dead character (that we will never see again in the show (zzz) )
I really thought it was just a shoutout to the book readers. Now you're telling me we may actually see (again) his almost magical weapon? the most wonderful and powerful blade that Planetos has ever seen?! There is something about these swords though. Sam stole Heartsbane, Bri has Oathkeeper!
I should stop now.
“Don’t fight in the North, or the South. Fight every battle everywhere. Always, in your mind.”
You are right Lady Dyanna, I forgot about Long Claw.
And please excuse me for a few minutes while I recuperate myself from the sound of 1MM panties exploding at the sight of your pic. (I hear it was not the sword who did it...)
“Don’t fight in the North, or the South. Fight every battle everywhere. Always, in your mind.”
He seemed like Sean Bean in Season 1. Contemplative. Haunted. Regretful.
AKA, Jon in Season 6.
Why did they have him act that way?
I can't prove it, but the way Arthur dies in the show and Ned's death remind me of each other, too. The looks on their faces. But those deaths are so far apart, it's hard to tell.
The line with Mance? Much easier to tie together. But, as you say, Arthur's behavior and Older Ned's, they seem very similar in the show.
Well, I think it's because the tower of joy fundamentally changed Ned. Ned was under the influence of Jon Arryn and Robert Baratheon up until and throughout the Rebellion.
Jon Arryn and Robert Baratheon would not have built those cairns, and I doubt they would have returned Dawn to Starfall.
Jaime Lannister somehow became the Smiling Knight, and Eddard Stark somehow became Arthur Dayne.
What made Ned go to Starfall instead of Winterfell?
The sword is not enough, particularly if he had Jon and Lyanna's body in custody.
And what makes the Daynes respect Ned? Nickname their heir after him--a nickname we learn about in a book where Edric Storm, son of Ned's best friend is NOT called Ned?
The sword is not enough--not in a world where people hold grudges so deeply.
Agreed, the dialogue and expressions of Bran and BR would be completly useless if they are going with RLJ. And notice that in the show, BR is not BR. He isn't a Targaryen. He was just an old man, who is now dead. If R+L=J, that seems an awful waste of a character who might explain Jon's purpose as a Targaryen bastard, or king.
Ned seems to disagree with you regarding the harmful nature of wolf-blood:
'The wolf blood,' my father used to call it. Lyanna had a touch of it, and my brother Brandon more than a touch. It brought them both to an early grave."
Passion and impulsiveness and love--that's what got Brandon dead, no?
True. But yeah, no heft. If that is "proof," then it has also been proven that Jorah is actually Jon Connington.
Who knows? Maybe Daario dyes his hair and will turn out to be Young Griff.
All art is at once surface and symbol. Those who go beneath the surface do so at their peril. Those who read the symbol do so at their peril. It is the spectator, and not life, that art really mirrors. Oscar Wilde.
It's bad enough having the hugest crush on a five minute appearance dead character (that we will never see again in the show )
I really thought it was just a shoutout to the book readers. Now you're telling me we may actually see (again) his almost magical weapon? the most wonderful and powerful blade that Planetos has ever seen?!
Indeed!!
The Hotness of the Morning was extraordinarily appealing--aesthetically, martially, and martyr-ly. Don't know if we'll see him again. But the sword? Absolutely! Otherwise there's no reason for them to put it at the foot of Lyanna's bed and have the camera focus not eh sword before it focused on Lyanna.
There is something about these swords though. Sam stole Heartsbane, Bri has Oathkeeper!
I should stop now.
YUP! The books make more of it that does the show. But the swords really matter.
But in the books, Sword of the Morning can't be stolen and Dawn can only be given by the Daynes to the Dayne they find worthy.
As for Oathkeeper--I keep thinking Brienne will slay a dragon with that thing.
All art is at once surface and symbol. Those who go beneath the surface do so at their peril. Those who read the symbol do so at their peril. It is the spectator, and not life, that art really mirrors. Oscar Wilde.
He seemed like Sean Bean in Season 1. Contemplative. Haunted. Regretful.
AKA, Jon in Season 6.
Why did they have him act that way?
I can't prove it, but the way Arthur dies in the show and Ned's death remind me of each other, too. The looks on their faces. But those deaths are so far apart, it's hard to tell.
The line with Mance? Much easier to tie together. But, as you say, Arthur's behavior and Older Ned's, they seem very similar in the show.
Well, I think it's because the tower of joy fundamentally changed Ned. Ned was under the influence of Jon Arryn and Robert Baratheon up until and throughout the Rebellion.
Jon Arryn and Robert Baratheon would not have built those cairns, and I doubt they would have returned Dawn to Starfall.
Jaime Lannister somehow became the Smiling Knight, and Eddard Stark somehow became Arthur Dayne.
What made Ned go to Starfall instead of Winterfell?
The sword is not enough, particularly if he had Jon and Lyanna's body in custody.
And what makes the Daynes respect Ned? Nickname their heir after him--a nickname we learn about in a book where Edric Storm, son of Ned's best friend is NOT called Ned?
The sword is not enough--not in a world where people hold grudges so deeply.
Agreed, the dialogue and expressions of Bran and BR would be completly useless if they are going with RLJ. And notice that in the show, BR is not BR. He isn't a Targaryen. He was just an old man, who is now dead. If R+L=J, that seems an awful waste of a character who might explain Jon's purpose as a Targaryen bastard, or king.
Ned seems to disagree with you regarding the harmful nature of wolf-blood:
'The wolf blood,' my father used to call it. Lyanna had a touch of it, and my brother Brandon more than a touch. It brought them both to an early grave."
Passion and impulsiveness and love--that's what got Brandon dead, no?
But I can't un-see the use of that sword. In books or show.
Hello. My name is Sly Wren. And I have Dawn blindness.
It's bad enough having the hugest crush on a five minute appearance dead character (that we will never see again in the show (zzz) )
I really thought it was just a shoutout to the book readers. Now you're telling me we may actually see (again) his almost magical weapon? the most wonderful and powerful blade that Planetos has ever seen?! There is something about these swords though. Sam stole Heartsbane, Bri has Oathkeeper!
I should stop now.
Even I'm cruising on AD. LOL
And I must state for the record that it seems VERY intentional on the part of the show-makers that they made Arthur Dayne such a crushable character considering Lyanna's predicament at the end of the season.
"I can see it. You have more of the north in you than your brothers."
You are right Lady Dyanna, I forgot about Long Claw.
And please excuse me for a few minutes while I recuperate myself from the sound of 1MM panties exploding at the sight of your pic. (I hear it was not the sword who did it...)
Lol! Oh shit! And here I am without a keyboard! LOLOLOLOLOLOL
"I can see it. You have more of the north in you than your brothers."