This one shocked me that Cersei already has a dead kid that right away makes the woods witch prophecy partially untrue, Cersei has at least 4 children and not 3 this might mean Tommen might not need to die
If the baby was a Baratheon, and his hair was not golden, then the gold shroud might not apply to him
Or Cersei might be lying to demoralize Cat, but dunno why she had to come in the room and do anything like that
Maybe she was just checking to make sure that Bran was not a danger to her
This one shocked me that Cersei already has a dead kid that right away makes the woods witch prophecy partially untrue, Cersei has at least 4 children and not 3 this might mean Tommen might not need to die
If the baby was a Baratheon, and his hair was not golden, then the gold shroud might not apply to him
Or Cersei might be lying to demoralize Cat, but dunno why she had to come in the room and do anything like that
Maybe she was just checking to make sure that Bran was not a danger to her
Whenever Cersei visits someone in her scenes she's always testing the waters. I also think that the writers added to give Cersei a humanizing moment, or at least it's Cersei's attempt to give herself the appearance of consoling Cat.
This one shocked me that Cersei already has a dead kid that right away makes the woods witch prophecy partially untrue, Cersei has at least 4 children and not 3 this might mean Tommen might not need to die
I'm thinking that it's more a case of the showrunners hoping that we forgot that part.
Whenever Cersei visits someone in her scenes she's always testing the waters. I also think that the writers added to give Cersei a humanizing moment, or at least it's Cersei's attempt to give herself the appearance of consoling Cat.
If I remember correctly, that's exactly why D&D said that they added that part.
Why must I always be the isle of crazy alone in an ocean of sensibility? The should to everybody else’s shouldn’t? The I-will to their better-nots?