Post by freyfamilyreunion on Sept 29, 2015 19:58:24 GMT
If the theory is that Howland through some type of "skinchanging" ability obtained the riding and jousting skills necessary to compete in the joust, then I think the person most likely to provide this ability to Howland would be Brandon. After all, we have no evidence that Ned was a good jouster, nor any evidence that he ever jousted. But we know that Brandon competed in the joust at Harrenhal, having lost to Rhaegar Targaryen. So Brandon may have in fact been a very good jouster, since it seems that on that particular day Rhaegar was "untouchable" defeating many skilled jousters. GRRM has also impressed upon us that Lyanna and Brandon both were very good horse riders. Ned's horse riding skills have never been described, I assume he is a fine horserider, but Martin has never gone out of his way to describe Ned as such. Finally, I think that it's significant that Lyanna had a touch of the "wolf's blood" and Brandon more than a touch. Perhaps just a comment about their impetuousness or perhaps an underlying clue that Lyanna and Brandon were also wargs.
Finally it is described that Old Gods provided strength to the arms of TKOTLT. It would be interesting to note what type of magic would be responsible for that? If he was channeling the strength of any one of the Starks, his best bet would be Brandon.
It should be noted that the KOTLT has a different physical description by Yandel than the one Meera provides
The first was the appearance of a mystery knight, a slight young man in ill-fitting armor whose device was a carved white weirwood tree, its features twisted in mirth. The Knight of the Laughing Tree, as this challenger was called, unhorsed three men in successive tilts, to the delight of the commons.
Given that the World Book is the more recent information, being released 13 years after ASOS, these changes are probably intentional. It goes out of its way to change the knight from being small to being slight, to specify it was a male in the armour, and to specify that it was a young male. We got some extra qualifiers here.
Your lordship lost a son at the Red Wedding. I lost four upon the Blackwater. And why? Because the Lannisters stole the throne. Go to King’s Landing and look on Tommen with your own eyes, if you doubt me. A blind man could see it. What does Stannis offer you? Vengeance. Vengeance for my sons and yours, for your husbands and your fathers and your brothers. Vengeance for your murdered lord, your murdered king, your butchered princes. Vengeance!
Given that the World Book is the more recent information, being released 13 years after ASOS, these changes are probably intentional. It goes out of its way to change the knight from being small to being slight, to specify it was a male in the armour, and to specify that it was a young male. We got some extra qualifiers here.
True. I think this gets back to WWS's point that Meera clearly thinks it was their father, and tilts the story in that direction, while Jojen points out that she may be wrong.
So slight. Who is slight? Not to go all quiet wolf on you guys again, LOL, but is Ned ever described as being or having been slight?
"I can see it. You have more of the north in you than your brothers."
True. I think this gets back to WWS's point that Meera clearly thinks it was their father, and tilts the story in that direction, while Jojen points out that she may be wrong.
This is a very good point, that often gets left out in discussions about the KOTLT story. Meera was not there, nor is she the original storyteller. She is telling her own version of the story, as she remembers/interprets Howland, who was the one there, telling the story, which itself is an interpretation of the event. And Jojen makes sure to interrupt every now and then to remind the reader that Meera is spinning her own tale here.
It's GRRM once again relying on the unreliable narrator. He's able to tell most of the story in this tale, without the tale having to be factually correct as the story is Howland's, but Meera is the one who tells us it.
Your lordship lost a son at the Red Wedding. I lost four upon the Blackwater. And why? Because the Lannisters stole the throne. Go to King’s Landing and look on Tommen with your own eyes, if you doubt me. A blind man could see it. What does Stannis offer you? Vengeance. Vengeance for my sons and yours, for your husbands and your fathers and your brothers. Vengeance for your murdered lord, your murdered king, your butchered princes. Vengeance!
Ned would remain in his tent "sleeping" while Howland was the actual knight.
I getcha, but I'm hesitant to go along. Ned seemed very unmagical by nature and decision. If there were something in the text to suggest he had such an ability, I could see it more.
"I can see it. You have more of the north in you than your brothers."
I am still gathering evidence. I know it's still pretty weak.
Well, the dead direwolf could be seen as one piece. The pups are emblematic of the Stark children's warghood. And, like the children, the pups had a direwolf for a father.
"I can see it. You have more of the north in you than your brothers."
Given that the World Book is the more recent information, being released 13 years after ASOS, these changes are probably intentional. It goes out of its way to change the knight from being small to being slight, to specify it was a male in the armour, and to specify that it was a young male. We got some extra qualifiers here.
True. I think this gets back to WWS's point that Meera clearly thinks it was their father, and tilts the story in that direction, while Jojen points out that she may be wrong.
So slight. Who is slight? Not to go all quiet wolf on you guys again, LOL, but is Ned ever described as being or having been slight?
Catelyn is surprised when she gets Ned's bones back that his bones are smaller than she remembers. Either she got the wrong bones (possible) or Ned had a presence about him which made up for being slighter.
We know a fully adult Ned is described as "stocky" however.
To get any more information we can look at Jon & Robb's adolescence to get an idea as to the growth of characters:
Robb is shorter than Ice at the beginning of AGOT until he has his growth spurt by the time ACOK starts. So we have it established that large growth spurts can occur in the Stark family. However Robb favors his Tully mother in appearance so it would likely be better to look to Hoster, Brynden & Edmure (whom Robb is compared as resembling a younger version of by Catelyn) to get a good idea about him.
We do however have a Stark-looking boy to compare with. One that is quite often labeled as looking like a younger version of Ned.
Jon for AGOT & ACOK has to strap Longclaw on his back because he's too short to fasten the bastard sword at his belt, and is described as slight and swift. In fact it isn't until sometime in ADWD that I noticed that Jon no longer had to do so--which means Jon had a later growth spurt than Robb. Add to this that Jon is often described as looking just like Ned did at his age, in addition to the whole Jon & Arya looking like traditional Starks aka Ned & Lyanna thing that fans squee over. And even in Jon isn't Ned's son, the fact that we can get a mini-Lyanna from Ned and a mini-Ned from Lyanna (to just use the most popular fan theory to avoid controversy and debate for the moment) and a mini-Edmure from Catelyn shows just how children more often reflect their uncles and aunts than they do their parents (in fact the only time do children strongly resemble their parents I've noticed is when there's incest in the family), and so even if Jon isn't Ned's son, as long as he's Lyanna's he can still be a "mini-Ned" in GRRM's universe.
Clearly Starks start out as sleight in adolescence and likely grow to be stocky once they get older, if we accept that a character like Jon transforms into a character like Ned. This isn't at all unacceptable.
The only question that remains IMO is if Ned, at 18/19, hasn't yet fully "filled out" yet to his adult stockiness or not. From having attended college (and university) and watched the undergraduate males as adolescent looking Freshmen who enter as lithe and sleight looking teenagers, and leave as stocky & filled out looking young adults--this kind of transformation occurring isn't just acceptable it's most likely rather normal for the age, and it's something that Eddard would be "undergoing" at the time.
So the old argument that "Ned hadn't finished growing/filling out" into his stocky build is a plausible one given what we have from observing how Robb & Jon have grown--most especially Jon. We also can take into consideration from Catelyn taking stock of Eddard's bones that his stocky adult build, plus whatever "presence" he brought to a room, covered a much smaller frame than Catelyn realized.
We also got the note from Catelyn that Ned was smaller than Brandon IIRC, but that's just popping into my head now as I finished typing this.
ETA:
And I need to finish reading a thread before responding (it's a bad habit that I never do), because I was ninja'd by Voice's own thoughts.
And I need to finish reading a thread before responding (it's a bad habit that I never do), because I was ninja'd by Voice's own thoughts.
LOL! But dude! You wrote it up beautifully! And I wasn't even convinced of my own thoughts. You convinced me. Ned was slender at Jon's age. It makes perfect sense.
You have just elevated the conversation tenfold.
Add this interp to the brothel chapter, and you have yourself some serious implications of the heart in conflict with itself on the matter of abstinence vs lust. I seriously dig it WWS.
Just imagine, no matter who Jon's father is, if Jon Turncloak = False Spring Ned, this sets up a very interesting dynamic. One could say Ygritte "turned to Stark" for comfort. All kinds of possibilities!
"I can see it. You have more of the north in you than your brothers."
it seems that on that particular day Rhaegar was "untouchable" defeating many
That was my assumption too until I re-read this story, because the mystery knight was defeating all comers as well, and after he beat the knights who's squires dishonored him he disappeared leaving only two competitors for the finals the next day, Rhaegar being one, so effectively Rhaegar only had one match on the following day.
I'm not quite sure that we can come to the conclusion. The Hedge Knight sets up how these jousting tourneys work:
Lord Ashford was staging this tourney to celebrate his daughter's thirteenth nameday. The fair maid would sit by her father's side as the reigning Queen of Love and Beauty. Five champions wearing her favors would defend her. All others must perforce be challengers, but any man who could defeat one of the champions would take his place and stand as a champion himself, until such time as another challenger unseated him. At the end of three days of jousting, the five who remained would determine whether the fair maid would retain the crown of love and beauty, or whether another would wear it in her place.
So if the rules were the same in the Harrenhal tourney, then we start out with the Whents as the five champions. All five were defeated at some point during the first day of jousting. The porcupine knight late in the day challenged one of the champions (whoever that was) and won. So on the beginning of the second day the porcupie knight and four other knights started the day as champions. Early in the morning of the second day, the pitchfork knight and the knight of two towers challenged two of the champions other than the porcupine knight. They won. These three knights managed to defeat any other challengers (if there were any) until late in the day when the mystery knight showed up. The mystery knight did the unusual gesture of challenging these three champions at once. The other two champions could have been anyone at that time, perhaps Rhaegar perhaps not.
The mystery knight defeated the three champions, leaving the mystery knight and only two other knights as champions when the tourney ended for the second day. The next morning, the mystery knight no showed, leaving only two champions. But since this was only the third day of the tourney, I still think anyone could have challenged those two knights. Perhaps Rhaegar was one of the two other champions on the morning of the third day, or perhaps he challenged one of the champions and won. And then fended off a number of other challengers on that same day, which would have inlcuded Brandon.
Interestingly, it seems that most lords were loathe to challenge a member of the royal family according to the Hedge Knight. But Rhaegar saw quite a number of challengers to his position as one of the champions.
What I'm not sure of is, since only two champions were still around on the morning of the third day, were there only two spots that the other knights competed for, or did Aerys or Lord Harrenhal appoint three other knights (perhaps Rhaegar and some of the Kingsguard) to make sure there were always five champions to compete against?
Regardless after the third day, Rhaegar must have been one of the champions still around if the Harrenhal rules followed the Ashford tourney rules. And then I assume the next two days the champions then competed among themselves until only one (Rhaegar remained).
So Brandon could have helped Howland on the second day of the tourney before he personally took part in the tourney on the third day when he may have been one of the persons who challenged Rhaegar's position as a champion.
Edit: If only two champions remained on the third day, then at the end of the third day, Rhaegar and Barristan must have been the only two champions still remaining, and they would have fought the next day. If three knights were made champions to bring the number of champions back to five on the third day, then it's unclear, but Brandon probably would have fought Rhaegar on the third day of the joust either as a champion himself and then lost, or he challenged Rhaegar's position as champion and lost.
So if the rules were the same in the Harrenhal tourney, then we start out with the Whents as the five champions. All five were defeated at some point during the first day of jousting.
Slight correction here: Oswell Whent survived through the first day and continued to reign as champion until sometime before Rhaegar and Barristan were the final 2 champions
"As my prince commands. The daughter of the castle was the queen of love and beauty, with four brothers and an uncle to defend her, but all four sons of Harrenhal were defeated on the first day. Their conquerors reigned briefly as champions, until they were vanquished in turn. As it happened, the end of the first day saw the porcupine knight win a place among the champions, and on the morning of the second day the pitchfork knight and the knight of the two towers were victorious as well. But late on the afternoon of that second day, as the shadows grew long, a mystery knight appeared in the lists."
Only the 4 sons of Harrenhal were defeated that first day. Oswell was the uncle of Harrenhal so he continued his reign for an unknown length of time. But it's actually quite likely that Rhaegar was the one who defeated him and that's where his initial championship came from
Prince Rhaegar emerged as the ultimate victor at the end of the competition. The crown prince, who did not normally compete in tourneys, surprised all by donning his armor and defeating every foe he faced, including four knights of the Kingsguard. In the final tilt, he unhorsed Ser Barristan Selmy, generally regarded as the finest lance in all the Seven Kingdoms, to win the champion's laurels.
Depending how you read this passage, Rhaegar either defeated 4 KG, or he defeated 5 KG. Either way, he defeated quite a few KG and Oswell was likely one of them.
What I'm not sure of is, since only two champions were still around on the morning of the third day, were there only two spots that the other knights competed for, or did Aerys or Lord Harrenhal appoint three other knights (perhaps Rhaegar and some of the Kingsguard) to make sure there were always five champions to compete against?
Edit: If only two champions remained on the third day, then at the end of the third day, Rhaegar and Barristan must have been the only two champions still remaining, and they would have fought the next day. If three knights were made champions to bring the number of champions back to five on the third day, then it's unclear, but Brandon probably would have fought Rhaegar on the third day of the joust either as a champion himself and then lost, or he challenged Rhaegar's position as champion and lost.
I've never thought about it this way, but let's look at the numbers on that fateful day when no lance could touch Rhaegar
Yet when the jousting began, the day belonged to Rhaegar Targaryen. The crown prince wore the armor he would die in: gleaming black plate with the three-headed dragon of his House wrought in rubies on the breast. A plume of scarlet silk streamed behind him when he rode, and it seemed no lance could touch him. Brandon fell to him, and Bronze Yohn Royce, and even the splendid Ser Arthur Dayne, the Sword of the Morning. Robert had been jesting with Jon and old Lord Hunter as the prince circled the field after unhorsing Ser Barristan in the final tilt to claim the champion's crown. Ned remembered the moment when all the smiles died, when Prince Rhaegar Targaryen urged his horse past his own wife, the Dornish princess Elia Martell, to lay the queen of beauty's laurel in Lyanna's lap. He could see it still: a crown of winter roses, blue as frost.
1. Rhaegar Targaryen 2. Brandon Stark 3. Bronze Yohn Royce 4. Ser Arthur Dayne 5. Ser Barristan Selmy
That's 5 men. From a tourney that started off with 5 champions. That's an interesting coincidence, no? It's quite possible that these 5 were the last 5 champions standing, and Rhaegar's defeat of the other 4 isn't him moving up the ranks, it's him eliminating the other champions till he's the last one standing and the overall winner of the tourney.
Your lordship lost a son at the Red Wedding. I lost four upon the Blackwater. And why? Because the Lannisters stole the throne. Go to King’s Landing and look on Tommen with your own eyes, if you doubt me. A blind man could see it. What does Stannis offer you? Vengeance. Vengeance for my sons and yours, for your husbands and your fathers and your brothers. Vengeance for your murdered lord, your murdered king, your butchered princes. Vengeance!
How do we reconcile 5 men with Meera's account that only two champions appeared on the final third day?
Because that wasn't the final day? The joust lasted 5 days, not 3.
"Five days of jousting were planned," she said. "There was a great seven-sided mêlée as well, and archery and axe-throwing, a horse race and tourney of singers . . ."
There being 2 champions on the start of the 3rd day doesn't mean that there couldn't have been 5 champions on the 5th day. With the KOTLT disappearing there were 3 spots that Whent or Aerys could have re-opened given that the KOTLT forfeited its spot in the tourney when they never reappeared.
I don't think it can be determined which day they were all defeated other than Ser Barristan since he's listed as being unhorsed in the final tilt.
Ned says "the day belonged to Rhaegar Targaryen" before listing those 4 men who fell before Rhaegar. It's clearly a list of the men Rhaegar faced in one day. If Ned meant that Rhaegar beat those 4 men throughout the 5 days of jousting, he would have just said "the tourney belonged to Rhaegar Targaryen" or something. Instead he narrows it done to "the day". It's one single day where Rhaegar beats Brandon, Bronze Yohn, Arthur Dayne, and Barristan. And this is supported by the fact that this can't be the list of every notable foe Rhaegar faced as Barristan says that Rhaegar unhorsed "them all" when saying who Rhaegar's competition were, the World Book details 2-3 KG that Rhaegar defeated that aren't in this list, and the World Book also says that he defeated all. He has to have faced more than 4 people, so this list, with Ned's qualification that it's "the day" is a list of the jousting Rhaegar did on the final day
And we can be sure that Rhaegar wasn't a champion by the 3rd day seeing as
That night at the great castle, the storm lord and the knight of skulls and kisses each swore they would unmask him, and the king himself urged men to challenge him, declaring that the face behind that helm was no friend of his. But the next morning, when the heralds blew their trumpets and the king took his seat, only two champions appeared. The Knight of the Laughing Tree had vanished. The king was wroth, and even sent his son the dragon prince to seek the man, but all they ever found was his painted shield, hanging abandoned in a tree. It was the dragon prince who won that tourney in the end
He didn't compete the third day. If he was one of the two champions who appeared on the 3rd day, then he had to have forfeited it because he was commanded to go find the KOTLT that day. Rhaegar's championship is therefore post 3rd day otherwise there shouldn't be any possible way that he forfeited, then somehow was able to compete again to make it to the finals 2 days later.
And it also stands to reason that Rhaegar wasn't even competing in the tournament yet by the 3rd day if Aerys is giving him royal missions on the 3rd day. Aerys came to Harrenhal to keep an eye on Rhaegar as he feared Rhaegar was attempting to throw a Great Council against him. He's not just going to command Rhaegar off the field, when the tournament ensures that Rhaegar can't meet with anybody if he's too busy jousting on the field. The tournament is the perfect excuse to ensure that Rhaegar can't have his GC and remains under Aerys eye. Sending him to deal with the KOTLT only makes sense if Rhaegar hadn't yet taken the field and already had his freedom as otherwise Aerys is giving up ensuring that Rhaegar sticks to the lists.
Your lordship lost a son at the Red Wedding. I lost four upon the Blackwater. And why? Because the Lannisters stole the throne. Go to King’s Landing and look on Tommen with your own eyes, if you doubt me. A blind man could see it. What does Stannis offer you? Vengeance. Vengeance for my sons and yours, for your husbands and your fathers and your brothers. Vengeance for your murdered lord, your murdered king, your butchered princes. Vengeance!
So if the rules were the same in the Harrenhal tourney, then we start out with the Whents as the five champions. All five were defeated at some point during the first day of jousting.
Slight correction here: Oswell Whent survived through the first day and continued to reign as champion until sometime before Rhaegar and Barristan were the final 2 champions
"As my prince commands. The daughter of the castle was the queen of love and beauty, with four brothers and an uncle to defend her, but all four sons of Harrenhal were defeated on the first day. Their conquerors reigned briefly as champions, until they were vanquished in turn. As it happened, the end of the first day saw the porcupine knight win a place among the champions, and on the morning of the second day the pitchfork knight and the knight of the two towers were victorious as well. But late on the afternoon of that second day, as the shadows grew long, a mystery knight appeared in the lists."
Only the 4 sons of Harrenhal were defeated that first day. Oswell was the uncle of Harrenhal so he continued his reign for an unknown length of time. But it's actually quite likely that Rhaegar was the one who defeated him and that's where his initial championship came from
Prince Rhaegar emerged as the ultimate victor at the end of the competition. The crown prince, who did not normally compete in tourneys, surprised all by donning his armor and defeating every foe he faced, including four knights of the Kingsguard. In the final tilt, he unhorsed Ser Barristan Selmy, generally regarded as the finest lance in all the Seven Kingdoms, to win the champion's laurels.
Depending how you read this passage, Rhaegar either defeated 4 KG, or he defeated 5 KG. Either way, he defeated quite a few KG and Oswell was likely one of them.
What I'm not sure of is, since only two champions were still around on the morning of the third day, were there only two spots that the other knights competed for, or did Aerys or Lord Harrenhal appoint three other knights (perhaps Rhaegar and some of the Kingsguard) to make sure there were always five champions to compete against?
Edit: If only two champions remained on the third day, then at the end of the third day, Rhaegar and Barristan must have been the only two champions still remaining, and they would have fought the next day. If three knights were made champions to bring the number of champions back to five on the third day, then it's unclear, but Brandon probably would have fought Rhaegar on the third day of the joust either as a champion himself and then lost, or he challenged Rhaegar's position as champion and lost.
I've never thought about it this way, but let's look at the numbers on that fateful day when no lance could touch Rhaegar
Yet when the jousting began, the day belonged to Rhaegar Targaryen. The crown prince wore the armor he would die in: gleaming black plate with the three-headed dragon of his House wrought in rubies on the breast. A plume of scarlet silk streamed behind him when he rode, and it seemed no lance could touch him. Brandon fell to him, and Bronze Yohn Royce, and even the splendid Ser Arthur Dayne, the Sword of the Morning. Robert had been jesting with Jon and old Lord Hunter as the prince circled the field after unhorsing Ser Barristan in the final tilt to claim the champion's crown. Ned remembered the moment when all the smiles died, when Prince Rhaegar Targaryen urged his horse past his own wife, the Dornish princess Elia Martell, to lay the queen of beauty's laurel in Lyanna's lap. He could see it still: a crown of winter roses, blue as frost.
1. Rhaegar Targaryen 2. Brandon Stark 3. Bronze Yohn Royce 4. Ser Arthur Dayne 5. Ser Barristan Selmy
That's 5 men. From a tourney that started off with 5 champions. That's an interesting coincidence, no? It's quite possible that these 5 were the last 5 champions standing, and Rhaegar's defeat of the other 4 isn't him moving up the ranks, it's him eliminating the other champions till he's the last one standing and the overall winner of the tourney.
Good catch on the Oswell Whent. That means that Oswell Whent had to have been a champion at least during some of the second day. And since Rhaegar defeated four kingsguards, then I would think that Oswell Whent was the champion that Rhaegar first defeated.
Rhaegar would have had to be one of the champions on the end of the third day to make the final champions tilt. I'm not sure that we can assume that he didn't compete on the third day and we can't assume that he wasn't one of the champions on the morning of the third day.
I think here are the possible scenarios. Rhaegar did not compete in the tourney, until after he returned from searching for the mystery knight. Depending on the time of day, Rhaegar may have returned from the errand and then challenged one of the champions before the end of the third day (if so, then it would have almost had to have been Oswell). Then Rhaegar had to have been challenged by at least one more of the Kingsguards and won the challenge. It could have been any of the others other than Jaime. But for some reason I doubt Gerold Hightower competed. So it would have been either Darry, or Martell. My bet is Martell. Then on the fourth and fifth day, Rhaegar challenges the other four champions, and defeats them in order: Brandon, Royce, Arthur Dayne, and Selmy. My only hesitation with that scenario is why would everyone have challenged Rhaegar on the fourth day? Surely some of the five champions would have been eliminated by someone other than Rhaegar?
The other possible scenario is that Rhaegar was one of the champions at the end of the second day, and was given a pass in having to defend his position while he was fulfilling Aerys errand. After all who is going to tell the King that Rhaegar has to forfeit his spot? If this is the case, it is hard to determine when Rhaegar met any of the contestants other than being one of the champions at the end of the third day and meeting Barristan in the final tilt.
Did I dream this, or was it stated somewhere that the format of the tourney more or less changed with the tourney? As in, there wasn't a true standard, it was kindof however the host wanted it structured.....
Not that it really matters, because I think this:
IMO, "the prayer to the old gods of north and Neck" is an indication that something more happened than simply securing a champion to fight in the crannogman's place.
...is right on the money. Howland got a champion, but it wasn't of the normal human variety.